Print or save as PDFBack to Insights
Grupo Datamétrica
Datametric Insights
Working paper · DI series · No. 08
DI-2026-08Economics & finance · Statistics & method

Venezuela: when the figures disagree, the method is the story

For the same, already finished year, ECLAC publishes 8.9% growth and the IMF 1.5%. Seven points apart is not a nuance: it is a usage warning.

PublishedAugust 24, 2026
Version1.0 · English
AuthorsAnalytics Unit
Reading time6 min read

Executive summary

01

Two multilateral bodies publish Venezuelan growth figures for 2025 that are 7.4 percentage points apart: 8.9% in ECLAC's Economic Survey of August 2026 and 1.5% in the IMF's World Economic Outlook of April 2026.

02

ECLAC revised its own estimate. In December 2025 it put that year at 6.5% and eight months later raised it to 8.9%. For 2026 it moved from projecting 3.0% to projecting 6.5%.

03

On inflation the distance is wider. The IMF projects 387.4% for 2026 and warns that it excludes Venezuelan prices from all its aggregates. ECLAC publishes no figure later than October 2024.

04

Neither institution is wrong. Both work with incomplete official information and both state so in writing. The mistake would be to take either figure as an input for a decision.

Headline figure7.4 pointsseparate the ECLAC and IMF growth estimates for the same year, already closed.
8.9%2025 growth according to ECLAC, in August 2026
1.5%2025 growth according to the IMF, in April 2026
387.4%inflation projected by the IMF for 2026
2004year of the IMF's most recent Article IV consultation

Context

A macroeconomic figure is not a direct observation: it is the result of applying a method to reported information. When that information is interrupted, each institution fills the gap with its own assumptions.

Venezuela is today the region's extreme case of that mechanism. Divergences between publications do not reflect political disagreement, but different reasonable ways of estimating what nobody is reporting.

When two serious sources disagree, the answer is not to pick the friendlier one.. It is to state the range, name the source at each end and decide on the less comfortable scenario. A single figure in a market without continuous statistics conveys a precision nobody has.

Table 1 · The same economy, three publications

GDP growth, in percentages
PublicationDate2025 GDP2026 GDP
ECLAC, Preliminary Overview 2025December 20256.5%3.0%
IMF, World Economic OutlookApril 20261.5%4.0%
ECLAC, Economic Survey 2026August 20268.9%6.5%
Sources: ECLAC, Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean 2025, table 1; IMF, World Economic Outlook April 2026, annex table 1.1.3; ECLAC, Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2026, table 1. All three are estimates or projections, not official country figures.

Table 2 · Inflation: what each source publishes, and what it warns

consumer price change
SourceReferenceValueStated caveat
ECLACTwelve months to December 2023189.8%Excluded from regional averages
ECLACTwelve months to October 202423.6%No later figure in the 2025 table
IMFAnnual average for 2025252.0%IMF staff estimate
IMFProjection for 2026387.4%Excluded from all WEO group composites
IMFProjection for 202794.4%"Interpret with caution", per the report
Sources: ECLAC, Preliminary Overview 2025, chapter V; in its inflation table the September 2025 column is empty for Venezuela and the December 2024 cell is footnoted as "data to October 2024". IMF, World Economic Outlook April 2026, annex table 1.1.3 and the Country Notes of the Statistical Appendix.

Business implications

State the range, not the point. A plan that depends on whether the economy grew 1.5% or 8.9% does not need a figure: it needs two scenarios and a trigger showing which one is playing out.

Use your own high-frequency indicators. Billed volume, units shipped and days of inventory are verifiable and depend on no official publication whatsoever.

Pin the cut-off date of every figure you use. An August 2026 estimate of the year 2025 and an April 2026 estimate of that same year are not interchangeable.

Methodology & data

Three institutional publications on the same economy and the same years are compared: ECLAC's Preliminary Overview 2025, the IMF's World Economic Outlook of April 2026 and ECLAC's Economic Survey 2026. No proprietary estimate and no non-institutional source is incorporated.

The subject of this document is the divergence between sources, not the true magnitude of the variables.

References

ECLAC (December 2025). Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2025. · ECLAC (20 August 2026). Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2026. · International Monetary Fund (April 2026). World Economic Outlook, annex table 1.1.3 and the Country Notes of the Statistical Appendix.

Next stepLet's review your operation and where the impact is.Data · Automation · Custom software
contacto@grupodatametrica.comdatametricgroup.comSuggested citation: Datametric Group (2026). Venezuela: when the figures disagree, the method is the story. Datametric Insights, DI-2026-08.
datametricgroup.com · Datametric InsightsDI-2026-08